Monday, October 25, 2010

Would regular lab work be bad also if u contacted the hiv virus... have lab work and it be adjectives common...?

Would regular lab work be bad also if u contacted the hiv virus... have lab work and it be adjectives common...?
Many people are surprised to swot that there is no such point as a test for AIDS. The test popularly referred to as "AIDS tests" do not identify or diagnose AIDS and cannot detect HIV, the virus claimed to cause AIDS. The ELISA and Western Blot test commonly used to diagnose HIV infection detect only interactions between proteins and antibodies thought to be specific for HIV -- they do not detect HIV itself. And contrary to popular belief, newer "viral load" test do not measure level of actual virus in the blood.
I don't suggest I understand fully the quiz, but I'll interpret it the best I can.
I am taking this as you have or mull over you may have HIV, but your regular lab work come back near no irregularities. If this is the case, later this in not an assertion of a denial status of HIV.
Unless an HIV test be specified in your lab work, consequently nothing would come rear as abnormal. I don't have an idea that those tests are customarily included in a regular lab workup unless specifically requested by you or your phyisician.
I'm not going to assume your serostatus, but if you suspect that you are HIV positive, you should win tested.
If you don't want to go to your regular doctor afterwards find a free or low-cost clinic in your nouns that does the testing anonymously.
This seem to be circular reasoning because if you were HIV positive a lab would hold previously confirmed the diagnosis. Wait three months and be retested or contact your doctor.

No comments:

Post a Comment